• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
easy GDPR - we make compliance with GDPR easy

easyGDPR

We make implementing General Data Protection Regulation Easy

  • Home
  • Services
    • Software
      • easyGDPR Quickcheck
      • (DEP) easyGDPR lite
      • (DEP) easyGDPR Standard
      • Data Subject Requests
      • Sophos
    • IT Security
    • network checkup
    • SME digitization funding
    • Data protection consulting
      • Data protection
      • Cybersecurity
    • Training
      • Data protection
      • Cybersecurity
  • Partner
    • Resellerprogramm
    • Affiliate programm
  • GDPR
    • GDPR News
    • FAQ
    • GDPR Decisions
    • GDPR penalties
    • GDPR legal text
  • Shop
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Newsletter registration
  • Login
    • Shop / Affiliate Program
    • easyGDPR Software
  • German
  • English

D130.217 (2022-0.479.809), deletion of a contribution from an online encyclopedia.

19/05/2023 by Jakob Guggenberger

In its decision of January 9, 2023, the data protection authority had to assess whether an information service provider operating an online encyclopedia had to delete the entry on the complaining party.
The complainant, who is an artist known to the general public in German-speaking countries and who has, among other things, acted in various capacities in film productions, all of which have a strong connection to Austria in common and whose other works are also primarily directed at German-speaking countries, has written an entry on the respondent’s online encyclopedia, which has been regularly updated by him. Other users or administrators have modified or deleted the complainant’s additions. Thereupon, the complainant filed a request for deletion of his entire entry. However, the respondent did not comply with this.
The data protection authority dismissed the complaint because it concluded that the complaining party’s right to erasure had not been violated.
The respondent is a non-profit foundation based in the USA that operates an online encyclopedia which processes the complainant’s personal data in an automated manner. The respondent also has a total of 38 national associations, some of which are based in the European Union (including Austria and Germany), and the individual national websites redirect users to the respondent’s platform either directly or via an intermediate step. This company offers information services about complainants, which are only available in two languages and are obviously primarily aimed at German-speaking countries. In this context, the fact that the complainant’s site is not available in English is particularly noteworthy. Since, in the overall view, the respondent has obviously oriented its services towards the European area – inter alia towards Austrian users – the factual and geographical scope of application for the GDPR is given (cf. Art. 3 par. 2 lit. a GDPR).
Based on the structural set-up as well as from the guidelines created by the online community, the respondent is at least a joint responsible party pursuant to Art. 4 Z 7 DSGVO in relation to the platform it operates, because it is responsible for financing as well as producing the infrastructure and has the final decision-making authority. The media privilege pursuant to Section 9 of the Austrian Data Protection Act also did not apply in the case at hand, especially since the minimum entrepreneurial structure, the corporate purpose of which is the content design of the website, which is carried out by an editorial team and a large number of employees or freelance media staff (cf. RIS-Justiz RS01298), does not exist. The respondent does not have an editor-in-chief or an editorial board, nor does it have similar institutions. A review of the content of the entries on the platform is carried out by the users and not by the respondent itself.
Since the contribution was factually correct, the complainant is a public figure and the public has an interest in information, and the same information is also publicly available on other websites on the Internet, as well as additional information about the complainant, the data protection authority came to the conclusion in the specific case that the respondent was right not to comply with the request for deletion, especially since the intensity of the interference can be classified as low and, moreover, the legitimate interest of the general public pursuant to Article 11 EU-GRC in access to information outweighs the interest of the complainant.
The decision has become final.

Source: DSB Austria

Category iconGDPR Decisions

Primary Sidebar

IT-Security Whitepaper Downloaden
  • German
  • English
  • Data Protection Statement
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Licence terms for easyGDPR
  • GDPR terms
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non Necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

functionality

Diese Art von Cookies erhöht die Benutzerfreundlichkeit unserer Website. Beispielsweise wird darin die von Ihnen ausgewählte Sprache gespeichert. Auch die Verfügbarkeit von Videostreams und sonstigem Inhalt kann von diesen Cookies abhängig sein. Wenn Sie diese Cookies ablehnen, ist die Benutzerfreundlichkeit eingeschränkt.

Save & Accept